View in browser
Hinrich-Foundation-logo

On a windy day on 2 April outside the White House, Donald Trump swept away America’s longstanding support for global economic integration. His “reciprocal” tariffs shredded whatever was left of US commitment to a multilateral trading system. In its wake, governments that depend on open economic engagement and cooperation must figure out what to do. They must do it together, as Deborah Elms writes, and a first step might be a coordinated statement from the CPTPP and EU, followed by dialogues in other collective venues. In a flurry of recent executive orders, Trump is laying out a new bid for the US to regain control of critical minerals globally, including opening talks with the politically troubled and corrupt gangs in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Trump’s minerals strategy, Henry Storey writes, appears to have one critical flaw: they do not address supply-side reform at home. There is by now little doubt that the world cannot make net zero goals set for 2030. The EU sought to address its carbon footprint and negative spillover by autonomous extraterritorial measures, most notably the CBAM, but has never really properly resolved concerns from trade partners and accusations of EU protectionism, Antoine Oger explores in a paper supported by the Hinrich Foundation. Plus, don’t miss our latest discussion guide on China’s long shadow over Asia’s minerals.


TRADE POLICY

How we move forward in Trump’s turbulent trade era

Deborah Elms Deborah Elms
15 April 2025
Elms - Trump turbulent world cropped

On a windy day on 2 April outside the White House, Donald Trump swept away America’s longstanding support for global economic integration. His “reciprocal” tariffs shredded whatever was left of US commitment to a multilateral trading system. In its wake, governments that depend on open economic engagement and cooperation must figure out what to do. They must do it together, our Head of Trade Policy Deborah Elms writes, and a first step might be a coordinated statement from the CPTPP and EU, followed by dialogues in other collective venues.

READ MORE

Share on X | LinkedIn | Facebook | Email


CRITICAL MINERALS

What Trump doesn’t get about critical minerals in the US

Henry Storey Henry Storey
15 April 2025
China critical mineral stranglehold-min

In a flurry of recent executive orders, Donald Trump is laying out a new bid for the US to regain control of critical minerals, including opening talks with the politically troubled and corrupt gangs in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Trump’s minerals strategy, as Dragoman research manager Henry Storey writes, appears to have one critical flaw: they do not address supply-side reform at home. The US is one of the slowest and most structurally challenged regulators when it comes to permitting processes for crucial parts of the mining value chain.

DOWNLOAD PAPER

Share on X | LinkedIn | Facebook | Email


SUSTAINABLE TRADE

What’s missing in CBAM and the EU’s net zero strategy

Antoine Oger Antoine Oger
15 April 2025
Oger - EU CBAM - cropped-min

There is by now little doubt that the world cannot make global net zero goals set for 2030. Not least among the culprits is Europe, which continues to generate an unsustainable carbon footprint, interim executive director of the Institute for European Environmental Policy Antoine Oger, writes in a paper supported by the Hinrich Foundation under its Research Grant program. The EU seeks to redress this by autonomous extraterritorial measures, most notably CBAM, but has never really properly resolved concerns from its trade partners over the mechanism. Oger examines the policy trilemma between climate ambition, technical feasibility, and international equity in the EU’s net zero strategy.

DOWNLOAD PAPER

Share on X | LinkedIn | Facebook | Email


DISCUSSION GUIDE

China’s long shadow on critical mineral guide cover.jpg

China’s long shadow on critical minerals looms over Asia

 

To secure critical minerals it lacks domestically, China has been investing heavily overseas. In Southeast Asia, it has invested about US$4 billion since 2012 in 12 projects, majority of them in Indonesia, which supplies 16% of the world’s nickel. From a long-term geopolitical, economic, and sustainability perspective, it is not in ASEAN’s interests to be drawn exclusively into one Great Power’s sphere of influence. Check out our latest discussion guide, based on a paper by Senior Research Fellow Stewart Paterson.

DOWNLOAD GUIDE

Share on X | LinkedIn | Facebook | Email


20250404 - hfAI Static Banners - Banner A - 970 x 250

The Hinrich Foundation is committed to advancing sustainable global trade.

We welcome your support by sharing our commentaries and analyses.

Please encourage others to subscribe to our newsletter.

 

hfAI logo

Visit hinrichfoundation.com

for more

QUICK LINKS

Events

For Educators

Infographics on global trade

Techno-nationalism

Guide to Master’s Programs

twitter-25x25
linkedin-25x25
facebook-25x25
youtube-25x25

Hinrich Foundation, an Asia based philanthropic organization, advancing sustainable global trade, visit hinrichfoundation.com

 

Manage preferences / Unsubscribe    |   Update your subscriber profile